This is a popular Christian attack: life without God is bleak. For example, Christian apologist Ken Ham said about the atheist worldview,
None of our accomplishments, advancements, breakthroughs, triumphs, or heartbreaks will ultimately matter as we face extinction along with our universe. This is certainly
a bleak and hopeless perspective.
And yet this perception doesn’t sound like that of atheists who exist in real life rather than those that exist just in Ken Ham’s head. Since he can’t correctly describe their worldview, maybe he should try again.
But instead of having a young-earth Creationist ineptly tell atheists what they think and how they’re wrong, we can explore the idea of life without God through an article by atheist Julian Baggini, “Yes, life without God can be bleak. Atheism is about facing up to that.”
Baggini makes two reasonable points: (1) atheists see no good evidence for God and refuse to live as if there were, and (2) in focusing on the positive side of life in recent ad campaigns, atheists have glossed over the fact that for many people life sucks.
While I agree with his points, I don’t like how he gets there. Let’s examine his support of the Christian claim that life without God is bleak.
Baggini sees the popular stereotype of atheists within society as “the dark, brooding existentialist gripped by the angst of a purposeless universe” and fears that atheists have overcompensated. They’ve pushed the happy side of atheism (without much apparent success, if “brooding existentialist” is still what comes to mind), but atheists haven’t acknowledged that life can be meaningless and miserable.
Atheists have to live with the knowledge that there is no salvation, no redemption, no second chances. Lives can go terribly wrong in ways that can never be put right.
Can you really tell the parents who lost their child to a suicide after years of depression that they should stop worrying and enjoy life? …
Sometimes life is shit and that’s all there is to it.
True, but this is the human condition. It’s not like the Christian has an advantage. Will you say to the Christian parents who lost their child to suicide, “They’re in a better place”? Or “It’s all part of God’s plan” or “God must’ve needed another angel” or “You’ll be reunited soon”? Do these evidence-less platitudes bring the parents much comfort? Would the parent rather hear empty Christian phrases or an atheist’s honest offer of help and support?
Both the atheist and the Christian feel that this hypothetical child’s death was an injustice—life is just not supposed to work that way—but Christians actually make things worse for themselves. Christians must believe just the right thing to meet heaven’s entrance requirements. What if they get it wrong? The invention of heaven created a new anxiety that never burdens the atheist.
The atheist’s advice would be to drop the beliefs in a God who isn’t there (and have him take his nonexistent hell with him), but the pastors were obliged to tap dance around this enormous burden of their own making, unable to seize the simple, obvious, and complete solution provided by the atheist’s worldview.
Many Christians grant God license to do things that seem immoral. Drowning humanity with the Flood (for example) sounds barbaric to us but might make good sense to a God who is omniscient. If God has carte blanche, he might just refuse entrance into heaven for any or all Christians for no (apparent) good reason. Since God does things that seem illogical or immoral to us, the Christian must see this as a very real possibility and one to which they could make no protest.
Baggini wonders where atheist morality comes from.
Anyone who thinks it’s easy to ground ethics either hasn’t done much moral philosophy or wasn’t concentrating when they did.
Here’s the short atheist answer: humans are social animals like other great apes. Evolution selected for social behavior (trust, compassion, Golden Rule, and so on) because these traits improved evolutionary fitness.
Christians make unwarranted claims for the existence and accessibility of objective morality and ground all this in make-believe, and he’s concerned about what grounds atheist morality? When Christians bring something compelling to the table, perhaps I’ll see a need to justify atheist morality more than the short answer above.
Although morality is arguably just as murky for the religious, at least there is some bedrock belief that gives a reason to believe that morality is real and will prevail.
No, it’s not murky for the atheist. We can see why morality evolved the way it did for humans. By contrast, Christians have only just-so stories about a creator god who loves us, drowns us, and/or consigns most of us to hell, depending on his mood.
So I think it’s time we atheists ’fessed up and admitted that life without God can sometimes be pretty grim….
The journey can be wonderful but it can also be arduous and it may end horribly.
Life with or without God can be grim. You seem to imagine that the alternative to atheism is skipping through a meadow, hand in hand with Jesus, with all worries forgotten. Some Christians might imagine that, but any honest Christian occasionally wonders if their story is just BS. Many Christian sites have articles about dealing with Christians’ inevitable doubts.
Concluded on the next page.
Source : http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2016/10/the-atheist-worldview-is-life-without-god-bleak/Terima Kasih for visit my website