Michigan Court Revives Dispute Over $100,000 Porsche The Owner Calls A 'lemon'

OKEMOS, Mich. — Was a $100,000 Porsche a lemon?

The Michigan appeals court says a Kent County woman will get a second chance to make her case with a jury.

Jane Meyering bought a new Porsche Cayenne in 2015, but she sued after having problems with the heating-and-cooling system.

The appeals court says an Ingham County judge wrongly disregarded Meyering's trial testimony and ruled in favor of Porsche North America. The court says the jury should have settled the dispute.

More on freep.com:

Man arrested in Flint charged in death in Kentucky

Gov. Whitmer declares state of disaster in Grand Rapids power outage

In Michigan, a car manufacturer can be forced to buy back or replace a new vehicle if it's not fixed after repeated attempts.

Meyering says cold air turned the windows frosty in winter. At other times, the blower motor didn't work properly. A Lansing-area dealer replaced corroded components but said it couldn't confirm any problems during a fourth visit.

Source : https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2019/02/10/appeals-court-dispute-lemon-porsche-cayenne/2829993002/

Thank you for visit my website
Michigan court revives dispute over $100,000 Porsche the owner calls a 'lemon'
Was a $100,000 Porsche a lemon?
Michigan Court Revives Dispute with Car Maker over $100K Porsche
Appeals Court revives dispute over Kent County woman’s $100,000 Porsche
California water bill has three possible paths for passage
Remnants of past wars haunt Obama’s trip to Asia
Kentucky Downs launches expanded gambling
Treetops disputes report it permitted fraternity mayhem
Michigan court revives dispute over $100,000 Porsche
MI Supreme Court rules victims in UIA cases can sue the state